The Issue
The legislature is debating legislation to regulate vending
machines in all K-12 schools. The bill would require that vending
machines provide only healthful alternatives. While the guidelines
will be determined by rulemaking, some of the items that will definitely
be banned include: candy products with more than xx grams of sugar
per serving; candy products with more than xx grams of fat per
serving; sodas with more than xx grams of sugar per serving and
sodas with more than xx grams of caffeine per serving.
General Points in Support of the Bill
- America's youth are becoming more and more obese. The products
served in our school's vending machines are exacerbating this
problem.
- This action will improve the marketplace for healthful snack
alternatives.
- The sugar and caffeine in these products often serve to increase
the attention and focus problems many children face.
Children will not be banned from eating these products. The
schools will simply stop playing a role in supplying them.
General Points in Opposition to the Bill
- It is not up to the schools to determine the eating habits
of children or teachers. These decisions should be made by
those individuals themselves.
- The revenues from these vending machines are used to pay
for a range of school expenses, from football team uniforms
to band trips. Machines serving healthful alternatives are
not likely to generate the same amount of income.
- In banning these machines, the schools are sending a message
that some foods are "bad". People should be able to make those
determinations themselves and to gain an understanding that
most foods are acceptable in moderation. Rather than banning
the machines, the schools should provide more education on
healthy nutrition and the benefits of exercise.
- Banning these foods on campus will cause many students to
leave the school campus during the day in search of their preferred
snacks. This will create additional safety concerns and cause
potential increases in tardiness.
Note that these are only a few general points to provide an
overview of the issue. Students should research the issue further
to develop quality arguments.
The Players: Managers
Materials: Description of all members and talking points
Responsibilities:
- Manage time, allowing every member on your side to speak
at least once
- You have 15 minutes total, broken in to three 5 minute sections
- Participate in at least one press interview
- Make sure best arguments get out
- Make sure best speaker closes
- Rebut spurious accusations of the other side
- Keep members "in line". Don't let them switch
- Convince the undecideds
Rep. Jones (R), Floor Manager for the majority
Introduced the legislation. Chair of the Commerce Committee.
Strongly supports legislation. District very conservative, suburban
area with a high percentage of hospitals and health insurance companies.
In addition, "Healthy Snax", the largest manufacturer of good-for-you
goodies is headquartered in the Congressman's district. Jones'
constituents see childhood obesity as a serious problem. They are
also strong supporters of any efforts to help kids focus and do
better in school. Rep. Jones received 74% of the vote in the last
election.
Rep. Means (D), Floor Manager for the minority
Co-chair of Commerce. Strongly opposes legislation. District
very liberal, urban area with a mix of lower income individuals
and academics. Means' constituents see vending machines as a great
way to raise money for schools that desparately need the revenue.
The district also houses a small liberal arts university which
has about 6,000 students. Means' company base is mainly small businesses
and the university. Rep. Means received 72% of the vote in the
last election.
The Players: Members
Materials: Your "identity" and general talking points
Responsibilities
- You must play your part
- You must speak at least once
- You must give at least one interview
- Make points that will "play well at home"
- Listen to your staff
- Make sure your initial decision is the right one (you can
change your mind)
Rep. Abernathy (R), supports legislation
Rep. Abernathy serves on the Committee with Rep. Jones and
has always been a loyal lieutenant. Abernathy represents an area
of the country that was recently ranked the "Most Obese", according
to a ranking done by the Centers for Disease Control. District
moderately conservative "bedroom" community of a larger urban
area. Abernathy's constituents generally drive their cars to work
(rarely walking or biking). Health insurance premiums are a big
concern. Rep. Abernathy received 65% of the vote in the last election
He has his eye on a Senate seat.
Rep. Silva (D), opposes legislation
Rep. Silva serves on the Committee with Rep. Means, and vehemently
opposes the legislation. In fact, he offered an amendment in committee
to essentially "gut" the bill. District is a very poor, inner-city
area. The main business is a candy packaging factory that provides
many jobs for inner-city residents. The factory also sponsors events
at the local high-school. Silva's constituents do not communicate
much with the congressional office. Those who do are looking for
the office to help them with economic development initiatives.
Silva's business base is almost non-existent with high turn-over
rates. Most talk to the office about the need for additional loans.
Rep. Silva received 85% of the vote in the last election.
Rep. Gallery (R), supports legislation
Rep. Gallery has reluctantly come out in support of the legislation.
He is a member of the Committee and supported the Silva amendment
to gut the bill. However, he thinks that the bill is better than
the status quo. Plus, he promised the chair he'd vote for the bill
on the floor if he could vote for the amendment in committee. His
own legislative initiative is riding on this promise. District
leans Republican although is by no means safe. Most residents have
not thought much about the issue of vending machines in schools.
Rep. Gallery received 55% of the vote in the last election.
Rep. August (R), opposes legislation
Although she is a Republican, Rep. August is bucking her party
on this issue. She has always been a strong supporter of civil
liberties, and is concerned that the legislation violates certain
individual rights. District leans Democratic. It is an up-and-coming "high
tech" area. August has been able to hold the seat as a result of
her strong support for education and other issues. Plus, people
like her. Her constituents generally support the idea that schools
should use whatever means they can to raise money, but haven't
thought much about this issue. They are in frequent contact with
the office and are deeply divided as to the best approach. The
business community, including a number of high-tech vending machine
companies, argues that there are other ways to address childrens'
weight and attention problems. Rep. August received 54% of the
vote in the last election.
Rep. Earle (D), supports legislation
Rep. Earle surprised no one when he came out in support of
the legislation. Many of his Democratic party colleagues have called
him a "turncoat" in the past. Rep. Earle has a following among
the younger "renegade" minority members. District is very blue-collar,
with mainly union and minimum wage jobs. The refinery provides
most of the employment in the region. Constituents are concerned
about their children's future. Many want to see a better life for
their kids than refinery work. The business community hasn't expressed
any views on this issue. Rep. Earle received 62% of the vote in
the last election.
Rep. Faire (R), Opposes Legislation
Party leaders were shocked when Rep. Faire announced her opposition.
She has led the crusade for improving children's health, even sponsoring
legislation to limit advertising of candy to youth markets. Rep.
Faire argues that the legislation goes too far. She'd rather err
on the side of protecting individual rights. She'd like to see
government focus more on efforts to increase physical activity
among kids. District is rural, with a high percentage of Quakers.
Constituents are not very concerned about the issue, as many schools
do not even have vending machines. The business community, on the
other hand, agrees with Rep. Faire, and strongly opposes the legislation.
Many of them are concerned that government efforts to restrict
the food available in schools will lead to restrictions of other
kinds. They are also concerned that the reduced revenue will negatively
impact the schools' ability to educate. Rep. Faire received 68%
of the vote in the last election.
Rep. Sienna (R), supports legislation
Rep. Sienna strongly supports the legislation and would go
even further to abolish all vending machines from schools. In fact,
Rep. Sienna believes that the federal government should take a
hands-off approach to almost every issue that Congress considers.
District very conservative rural area. Strongly Republican. One-room
schoolhouses are still in use, and many parents home-school their
kids. The library has one old soda machine that no one uses.
Constituents agree with Rep. Sienna and are proud to have him
fighting for their money in Washington. The business community
supports the legislation. Rep. Sienna received 80% of the vote
in the last election.
Rep. Denny (D), opposes legislation
Rep. Denny has come out in opposition to the legislation, although
it is a very tough call. Her district schools are desperately in
need of the money provided by vending machines, but parents in
the area oppose allowing kids access to sugary snacks. The parents
group that supports the local high school marching band opposes
the legislation, as the band is using the money from vending machines
to finance their trip to the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade. On
the other hand, the PTA has come out strongly in support of the
legislation. They argue that the band can finance their trip through
other means. District is a suburban area. Many workers commute
the nearby university and businesses in the medium-sized city nearby.
Rep. Denny received 52% of the vote in the last election.
The Players: Staff
Materials: Member / Party assignment (one staff person for
the supporters and one staff person for the opponents), notes to
READ to members, and member descriptions for your assignments
Responsibilities
- Read each round's "note" to the pertinent member during that
round (i.e., round one note during round one, round two during
round two, etc.)
- DO NOT GIVE THE MEMBER THE CARD. He or she must assimilate
the information verbally
- You must get to all your members during the round and you
may not share the information with other staff or members (you
may have to pull the members away from other discussions /
press)
Notes for Rep. Abernathy (supports)
Round One: A close friend of yours has been named the new
CEO of Chocolate Heaven, a candy bar company. He is urging you
to change your mind., saying that he will work to integrate more
healthful alternatives into the product line.
Round Two: Your constituents, previously silent on the subject,
are calling your office in droves asking for more information
about the President's "More Active Kids" program. The President
announced this program in an attempt to kill the bill. He argues
that the real problem is youth immobility, not necessarily diet.
Round Three: Senator Smith (the senior Senator from your state)
has just called to let you know about the vote in the Senate.
He voted against the bill, and urges you to do the same, especially
since it will never become law. He says that state-wide, this
issue is a killer.
Notes for Rep. Silva (opposes)
Round One: A front page story in your local paper highlights
the differences between school finances in your district vs.
the neighboring wealthy suburb.
Round Two: In a recent national report, your community is ranked
below Bosnia is terms of high school graduation rates.
Round Three: The local radio station is running a show about
the staggering high school drop-out rates in your district. They
are urging people to call YOUR office to try to fix this appalling
problem.
Notes for Rep. Gallery (supports)
Round One: Thre's a story on front page of local paper about
how the lack in school financing is affecting your area. In fact,
the local football team missed the state championships because
their bus (which is funded in part from vending machine proceeds)
broke down on the way to the game.
Round Two: Dr. Laura is on the air praising you for your courageous
switch. She says you've put children's health ahead of big government.
Round Three: Calls are pouring in from your district in response
to Dr. Laura. Unfortunately, most of them (70%) are from people
who are very angry that you changed your mind. They're saying
they will support your opponent.
Notes for Rep. August (opposes)
Round One: Your Republican opponent (who has a significant
fundraising advantage over you) has called a press conference
to denounce what he calls your opposition to efforts to improve
child health. He wants to know why you support taking authority
away from parents and giving it to government.
Round Two: A local business group "Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities" (financed
in part by Chocolate Heaven, a huge candy manufacturere) has
just awarded you their "business leader of the year" award.
Constituents are calling in to congratulate you!
Round Three: A major campaign donor has indicated that if you
continue in your opposition of the bill, they will cancel a scheduled
fundraiser.
Notes for Rep. Earle (supports)
Round One: Your office is the target of a phone-in campaign,
but unfortunately most of your constituents do not understand
the issue. Nevertheless, they're asking you to change your mind.
Round Two: A local morning TV show ran a story about the lack
of funds in schools and libraries throughout the region. In fact,
in a national study, announced today, your state ranked dead
last.
Round Three: A major disaster occurs at the refinery. Workers
have been killed and injured. Your constituents are clamoring
for you to get home. Problem is that in order to get back today,
you'll have to miss the vote. Your opponent is arguing that your
place is with your people, and if you don't get back, you don't
deserve to represent them.
Notes for Rep. Faire (opposes)
Round One: Your legislation (passed last year) to limit advertising
of candy to youth markets is having its first test case. A self-described
defender of the first amendment is put on trial for advertising
high-sugar, low nutrient candy in child care centers.
Round Two: Dr. Laura is appalled (and sharing that with her listeners)
that on the very day your legislation is being implemented, you
have decided to oppose this legislation. On the other hand, the
technology community has praised your foresighted approach.
Round Three: Your constituents, including your pastor, are begging
you to change your mind, while the local chapter of the Child
Psychologist's association is praising your courage.
Notes for Rep. Sienna (supports)
Round One: Because you feel that the federal government has
no role to play in regulating any private enterprise, you had
filed a brief in a case at the Supreme Court arguing that there
should be NO limitations on the First amendment. This is in response
to a case regarding recent legislation to limit the advertising
of candy in youth markets.
Round Two: Dr. Laura, who disagreed with you on the question
of advertising of candy, is glad to see that you two see eye
to eye on the Vending machines.
Round Three: Your constituents, concerned about the recent refinery
fire that made national headlines, want you to spend less time
on vending machines and more time looking into safety issues
and refineries in your district.
Notes for Rep. Denny (opposes)
Round One: Legislation to regulate the advertising of candy
in youth markets that you strongly opposed (and gained strong
points in the district for doing so) is about to be tested in
the Supreme Court.
Round Two: The President wants to cement your opposition to the
bill with the promise of some funds from his "More Active Kids" program.
He'll give you 2.5 million to complete a project you've been
working on for years.
Round Three: Your opponent has called a press conference regarding
your total disregard for the financial needs of the small business
community.
Players: Press
Materials: Description of members you are responsible for
Responsibilities
- You must interview the two people you are responsible for
at least once and report at least once on each person
- Ask "tough" questions at each round
- Report during the debate to TV crew
- The two managers are unassigned. Only the best reporters
will be able to get to them
- Interview the undecideds as well
Press Person Number One Assignment: Abernathy and Silva
Press Person Number Two Assignment: Gallery and August
Press Person Number Three Assignment: Earle and Jones
Press Person Number Four Assignment: Sienna and Denny
Players: TV Crew (1 person)
Roam around trying to get the reporters (and an occasional member)
on tape.
Must get to all four reporters twice each. |