The Issue
Federal law enforcement officials have asked Congress to make
it easier for them to wire-tap the phones and computers of suspected
terrorists. Congressman Jones has introduced legislation (the "Freedom
and Fairness for America Act" to allow the FBI, CIA and other similar
agencies to tap phones and computers without prior judicial approval,
so long as they receive approval within one week of placing the
tap. Law enforcement may use any evidence collected in the prosecution
of any federal crime. If the tap is denied, the law enforcement
agency in question must pay restitution (amount to be determined
by rulemaking) to the person whose phone/computer was tapped. The
legislation sunsets in five years.
General Points in Support of the Bill
- Terrorism is a serious national problem and drastic measures
are necessary to ensure the safety of law-abiding citizens.
- This is a short-term proposal that will sunset after the
war on terrorism is over. It is not intended to be a permanent
solution.
Any innocent victims will receive restitution for any perceived
violation of privacy.
- Law enforcement needs this wide-ranging authority to ensure
that terrorists do not slip through legal loopholes.
General Points in Opposition to the Bill
- This bill gives law enforcement wide-ranging authority to
tap the phones and computers of any citizen. It is a tremendous
violation of privacy.
- Law enforcement already has all the tools it needs to build
a case against and successfully prosecute terrorists.
- Once this authority is given to law enforcement officials,
they are likely to lobby heavily to keep and even expand it.
It will be easy for Congress to decide not to sunset the provision.
- The legislation would allow law enforcement to collect and
use evidence for violation of any federal law, even those unrelated
to terrorism.
Note that these are only a few general points to provide an
overview of the issue. Students should research the issue further
to develop quality arguments. Some resources include:
The Federal Bureau
of Investigation site
Privacy groups
Speakout.com: www.speakout.com
The Players: Managers
Materials: Description of all members and talking points
Responsibilities
- Manage time, allowing every member on your side to speak
at least once
- You have 15 minutes total, broken in to three 5 minute sections
- Participate in at least one press interview
- Make sure best arguments get out
- Make sure best speaker closes
- Rebut spurious accusations of the other side
- Keep members "in line". Don't let them switch
- Convince the undecideds
Rep. Jones (R), Floor Manager for the majority
Introduced the legislation. Chair of the Judiciary Committee.
Strongly supports legislation. District very conservative, suburban
area with a high percentage of military personnel. In addition,
the largest manufacturer of wire taps is headquartered in the Congressman's
district. Jones' constituents view terrorism as a serious threat.
About 10,000 people from the military base in the district have
or are currently taken part in terrorism-related military actions.
Rep. Jones received 74% of the vote in the last election.
Rep. Means (D), Floor Manager for the minority
Co-chair of Judiciary. Strongly opposes legislation. District
very liberal, urban area with a mix of lower income individuals
and academics. Means' constituents are wary of law enforcement
officials. Many of them have been wrongly accused of crimes. The
district also houses a small liberal arts university which has
about 6,000 students. Means' company base is mainly small businesses
and the university. Rep. Means received 72% of the vote in the
last election.
The Players: Members
Materials: Your "identity" and general talking points
Responsibilities
- You must play your part
- You must speak at least once
- You must give at least one interview
- Make points that will "play well at home"
- Listen to your staff
- Make sure your initial decision is the right one (you can
change your mind)
Rep. Abernathy (R), supports legislation
Rep. Abernathy serves on the Committee with Rep. Jones and
has always been a loyal lieutenant. Abernathy represents an area
of the country that was directly affected by terrorism when a car
bomb was set off at a major intersection, killing two people and
injuring 50. District moderately conservative "bedroom" community
of a larger urban area. Abernathy's constituents were appalled
by the car bombing. Rep. Abernathy received 65% of the vote in
the last election He has his eye on a Senate seat.
Rep. Silva (D), opposes legislation
Rep. Silva serves on the Committee with Rep. Means, and vehemently
opposes the legislation. In fact, he offered an amendment in committee
to essentially "gut" the bill. District is a very poor, inner-city
area with a high crime-rate and a police department that has received
bad press for mistreating detainees. Many of the people who live
in the district are illegal immigrants who do not speak English
very well. Silva's constituents do not communicate much with the
congressional office. Those who do are looking for the office to
help them with perceived injustices in the judicial system.
Silva's business base is almost non-existent with high turn-over
rates. Most talk to the office about the need for additional
loans. Rep. Silva received 85% of the vote in the last election.
Rep. Gallery (R), supports legislation
Rep. Gallery has reluctantly come out in support of the legislation.
He is a member of the Committee and supported the Silva amendment
to gut the bill. However, he thinks that the bill is better than
the status quo. Plus, he promised the chair he'd vote for the bill
on the floor if he could vote for the amendment in committee. His
own legislative initiative is riding on this promise. District
leans Republican although is by no means safe. Most residents have
not been directly affected by terrorism and have not thought much
about the issue. Rep. Gallery received 55% of the vote in the last
election.
Rep. August (R), opposes legislation
Although she is a Republican, Rep. August is bucking her party
on this issue. She has always been a strong supporter of civil
liberties, and is concerned that the legislation gives law enforcement
too much power. District leans Democratic. It is an up-and-coming "high
tech" area. August has been able to hold the seat as a result of
her strong support for education and other issues. Plus, people
like her. Her constituents generally support more personal privacy,
but haven't thought much about this issue. They are in frequent
contact with the office and are deeply divided as to the best approach.
The business community, including a number of high-tech surveillance
companies, argues that there are other less intrusive ways, besides
wire-tapping, to collect evidence. Rep. August received 54% of
the vote in the last election.
Rep. Earle (D), supports legislation
Rep. Earle surprised no one when he came out in support of
the legislation. Many of his Democratic party colleagues have called
him a "turncoat" in the past. Rep. Earle has a following among
the younger "renegade" minority members. District is very blue-collar,
with mainly union and minimum wage jobs. The refinery provides
most of the employment in the region. Constituents are concerned
about their children's future. Many want to see a better life for
their kids than refinery work. The business community hasn't expressed
any views on this issue. Rep. Earle received 62% of the vote in
the last election.
Rep. Faire (R), Opposes Legislation
Party leaders were shocked when Rep. Faire announced her opposition.
She has led the crusade for increased funding for the war on terrorism.
Rep. Faire argues that the legislation goes too far. She'd rather
err on the side of protecting privacy, while providing law enforcement
with other tools to combat terrorism. District is rural, with a
high percentage of Quakers. Constituents are not very concerned
about the wire-tapping as most of them have no computer access
and only one phone. They feel that they are not likely to be targets
of law enforcement's efforts. The business community, on the other
hand, agrees with Rep. Faire, and strongly opposes the legislation.
Many of them are working to bring computer technology to the community
and are concerned that invasions of privacy will become a big issue.
Rep. Faire received 68% of the vote in the last election.
Rep. Sienna (R), supports legislation
Rep. Sienna strongly supports the legislation and would go
even further to allow law enforcement to tap phones and computers
without any judicial review. In fact, Rep. Sienna believes that
the federal government should be able to incarcerate suspected
terrorists without due cause. District very conservative rural
area. Strongly Republican. Hardly anyone has access to the Internet
at home. There is a military base in the district, as well as a
police training academy. Constituents agree with Rep. Sienna and
are proud to have him fighting for their security in Washington.
The business community supports the legislation. Rep. Sienna received
80% of the vote in the last election.
Rep. Denny (D), opposes legislation
Rep. Denny has come out in opposition to the legislation, although
it is a very tough call. Many constituents are concerned about
privacy violations, but businesses in the area support even stronger
efforts to capture terrorists. District is a suburban area. Many
workers commute to the nearby university and businesses in the
medium-sized city nearby. The region has both an airport as well
as a major train station, so business interests are worried about
the impact terrorism might have on their ability to ship products
out of the area. Rep. Denny received 52% of the vote in the last
election.
The Players: Staff
Materials: Member / Party assignment (one staff person for
the supporters and one staff person for the opponents), notes
to READ to members, and member descriptions for your assignments
Responsibilities
- Read each round's "note" to the pertinent member during that
round (i.e., round one note during round one, round two during
round two, etc.)
- DO NOT GIVE THE MEMBER THE CARD. He or she must assimilate
the information verbally
- You must get to all your members during the round and you
may not share the information with other staff or members (you
may have to pull the members away from other discussions /
press)
Notes for Rep. Abernathy (supports)
Round One: A close friend of yours has been named the new
head of the Organization to Protect American's Privacy. He is
urging you to change your mind, saying that it violates basic
democratic rights.
Round Two: Your constituents, previously silent on the subject,
are calling your office in droves asking for more information
about the President's "Safety in America" program, which, according
to the President, would increase surveillance powers for law
enforcement without curtailing private rights. Now that they've
heard about this program, they wonder why you support the legislation.
Round Three: Senator Smith (the senior Senator from your state)
has just called to let you know about the vote in the Senate.
He voted against the bill, and urges you to do the same, especially
since it will never become law. He says that state-wide, this
issue is a killer.
Notes for Rep. Silva (opposes)
Round One: Front page news: Police in your district beat
and severely injure a local citizen after breaking into the wrong
house in a drug raid.
Round Two: In a recent national report, your community is ranked
highest in the country in terms of areas harboring suspected
terrorists.
Round Three: The local radio station is running a show about
rampant police brutality within your district. They are urging
people to call YOUR office to try to fix this appalling problem.
Notes for Rep. Gallery (supports)
Round One: There's a story on front page of local paper about
how local law enforcement issued over 100 wire taps in the last
year, only 1 of which yielded any useful information for arrest
and prosecution.
Round Two: The local talk show host is on the air praising you
for your courageous switch. She says you've put the people's
security first and foremost.
Round Three: Calls are pouring in from your district in response
to the talk show. Unfortunately, most of them (70%) are from
people who are very angry that you changed your mind. They're
saying they will support your opponent.
Notes for Rep. August (opposes)
Round One: Your Republican opponent (who has a significant
fundraising advantage over you) has called a press conference
to denounce what he calls your support for a federal takeover
of the nation's communities. He wants to know why you support
allowing "Jack-booted thugs" to terrorize local citizens.
Round Two: A local business group "Security and Pride in America" has
just awarded you their "business leader of the year" award.
Constituents are calling in to congratulate you!
Round Three: A major campaign donor has indicated that if you
continue in your opposition of the bill, they will cancel a scheduled
fundraiser.
Notes for Rep. Earle (supports)
Round One: Your office is the target of a phone-in campaign,
but unfortunately most of your constituents do not understand
the issue. Nevertheless, they're asking you to change your mind.
Round Two: A local morning TV show ran a story about the impact
of the Internet on people's privacy. Their studies show that
medical, financial and personal privacy is at an all time low.
Round Three: A major disaster occurs at the refinery. Workers
have been killed and injured. Your constituents are clamoring
for you to get home. Problem is that in order to get back today,
you'll have to miss the vote. Your opponent is arguing that your
place is with your people, and if you don't get back, you don't
deserve to represent them.
Notes for Rep. Faire (opposes)
Round One: You are introducing legislation today to increase
funding for the war on terrorism. Additional funds will be provided
to local law enforcement, military personnel, INS agents and
others to ensure continued vigilance.
Round Two: The local radio talk show host is appalled (and sharing
that with her listeners) that on the very day your new legislation
is being introduced, you have decided to oppose this legislation.
She thinks it is hypocritical and self-serving. On the other
hand, the business community has praised your foresighted approach
Round Three: Your constituents, including your local sheriff,
are begging you to change your mind, while the local chapter
of the Organization to Protect America's Privacy is praising
your courage.
Notes for Rep. Sienna (supports)
Round One: A recently released national report indicates
that your region of the country has had the least number of wire
taps allowed by judicial review. At the same time, the local
story is reporting that two suspected terrorists packed up their
bags and departed in the middle of the night after law enforcement
began 24-hour surveillance of their house.
Round Two: A local radio talk show host, who has disagreed with
you in the past on other questions of civil liberties, is glad
to see that you two see eye to eye on this legislation
Round Three: Your constituents, concerned about the safety of
military personnel overseas, want you to spend less time wire-tapping
and more on providing additional funds for overseas personnel.
Notes for Rep. Denny (opposes)
Round One: Rep. Faire is introducing legislation to increase
funding for local law enforcement and the INS. You prefer the
idea of increasing financial resources as opposed to providing
additional law enforcement authority.
Round Two: The President wants to cement your opposition to the
bill with the promise of some funds from his "Security in America" program.
He'll give you 2.5 million to complete a project you've been
working on for years. The recently released national report indicates
that your community is about average in terms of wire tapping
usefulness.
Round Three: Your opponent has called a press conference regarding
your total disregard for the needs of the business community,
which is concerned about the impact of terrorism on shipping.
Players: Press
Materials: Description of members you are responsible for
Responsibilities
- You must interview the two people you are responsible for
at least once and report at least once on each person
- Ask "tough" questions at each round
- Report during the debate to TV crew
- The two managers are unassigned. Only the best reporters
will be able to get to them
- Interview the undecideds as well
Press Person Number One Assignment: Abernathy and Silva
Press Person Number Two Assignment: Gallery and August
Press Person Number Three Assignment: Earle and Jones
Press Person Number Four Assignment: Sienna and Denny
Players: TV Crew (1 person)
Roam around trying to get the reporters (and an occasional member)
on tape.
Must get to all four reporters twice each.
Headlines
Round One
The General Accounting Office, a government watchdog agency,
releases a report suggesting that delays in securing wire-tap
authority has resulted in the escape from custody of at least
100 suspected terrorists in the last five years. At the same
time, the report indicates that only one in 50 wire taps imposed
by local or national authorities ever yield any useful evidence.
Round Two
The President has just announced a "Safety in America" program,
which extends additional authorities to law enforcement, such
as expedited judicial review (within 5 hours) of requests to
place wire taps.
Round Three
The Senate has just voted (by a vote of 55-45) to kill the legislation.
This means that even if it passes the House, there is no chance
of it becoming law. |