The New District
The Democratic Incumbent
The Republican Incumbent
The Analysts
How to Teach this Case
The New District
Every ten years, the United States Census is taken. Following
the census, congressional seats are reallocated to the states
based upon population - a total of 435 seats are awarded (this
process is called reapportionment). Then, within each state,
congressional seats are redistricted so that each district has
an equal population. Many districts change only a small amount
after each redistricting; some, like this one, become reborn
as something different from what they used to be.
This district is actually a combination of two old districts.
After the last census, the state of Rockland lost one congressional
seat. The Democrats in the state controlled the redistricting
(they had a majority in the state legislature and controlled
the governorship). They carved up the 7th congressional district
(occupied by a Republican) into three parts - these parts were
added to the 4th, 6th, and 9th districts, each controlled by
Democrats. The Republican incumbent whose district was carved
up decided to challenge the incumbent in this district, the 4th
congressional district of Rockland.
The 4th has the largest African-American population in the state
- almost 30%. This includes some economically depressed communities,
as well as a number of middle-class African-American neighborhoods.
The African-American voters are the most consistently Democratic
voters in the state. The district also includes some blue-collar
areas with large numbers of union workers. The redistricting
also brought in some economically well off, socially conservative
suburbs. About 70% of the current district was part of the old
4th district; the rest is part of the old 7th district.
The Democratic Incumbent - Regina
Flett
Regina Flett was elected to Congress eight years ago
after serving in the state legislature for six years. She grew
up in Brooklyn, New York, and moved to Rockland after graduating
from college. She raised her family and then, just before her
40th birthday, went back to school to get her law degree. While
in law school, she became politically active. She worked for
the district attorney for five years after law school, then
ran for the state assembly and for Congress. She has generally
had a safe seat.
Flett describes herself as a liberal pragmatist. As an African-American
woman, she naturally can be counted on to play an active role
on issues of concern to both women and African-Americans. She
is a strong supporter of affirmative action, abortion rights,
and greater social spending on anti-poverty programs. She has
also attempted to pass legislation on sexual harassment issues.
She believes very strongly that the government needs to invest
more money in inner cities, either through greater spending or
through targeted tax breaks to companies that create jobs in
urban areas.
Flett has had success within Congress working with members who
do not share her ideological beliefs. She joined forces with
a conservative Republican from her state to get a tax break for
a local defense contractor, which saved hundreds of jobs. She
has the reputation of being a consensus-seeker who is capable
of making a deal. This disappoints some ideologues in her party,
but likely makes her more effective in the end.
The Republican Incumbent - Al Sparks
"I'm angry, I'm down, but I'm not out," Al
Sparks said the day he announced he would oppose Regina Flett
in the redrawn 4th congressional district. Sparks had seen his
old district, the 7th, redrawn by the Democratic legislature.
Sparks was determined to run again. He chose to run in this district
because his home is located here, and because this district offers
the best chance for a Republican among the three districts that
hold a piece of his old district.
Sparks has one critical problem to overcome. Despite his fourteen
years in Congress, it is almost as if he needs to start completely
over. Over two-thirds of this district is unfamiliar territory
to him. He consequently has had to spend much time here in the
last few months building relationships with his new constituents.
Since his old district was almost 100% white, white-collar and
suburban, he also has had to work harder at familiarizing himself
with issues of greatest concern to African-Americans and union
workers.
Sparks was popular in his old district. He supported conservative
economic and social policies - low taxes and spending, anti-abortion,
pro-business, etc. This formula worked well in the old district,
as he was able to secure reelection by safe margins. But, given
his age (he is now 67), the Democrats chose his district as the
one to carve up since they thought he might retire. Sparks surprised
many by sticking around for the fight.
Sparks expects to hold his old constituents fairly easily. But
to win, Sparks knows that he will need to secure votes from the
part of the district Flett has represented. He intends to do
this by concentrating on the religiosity of African-American
voters. Sparks suspects that churchgoing African-Americans are
not completely against a socially conservative agenda on issues
such as school prayer and abortion. He is counting on this, coupled
with his reputation as a fair and consensus-seeking legislator,
to give him a shot at winning.
The Analysts
Political analyst Sam Balish describes the race as follows:
This is an old-fashioned turf war, and Regina Flett controls
the turf. She has a tremendous advantage in terms of name recognition
in this new district, and must be favored given the large percentage
of union and African-American voters in the district. But, she's
never had a challenge like this before. She's never had to deal
with a strong challenger like Sparks. He's a proven votegetter,
and the social conservatives who support him tend to turn out
at higher numbers. If the turnout numbers favor Sparks, he has
a chance. Leans Democrat.
| NOTE TO TEACHERS: If you
want to use the case study as a handout for students
but do not want them to see the consultants' evaluations,
simply print the entire case study and mask what follows
when photocopying it. In any case, you probably do not
want to share the last portion, "How to Teach this Case." |
Democratic Party consultant Barry Simon has offered the following
advice to the Flett campaign: It is certainly scary to imagine
an election where your opponent is a distinguished, long-serving
incumbent from the other party. That would cause me to lose sleep.
But, upon further inspection, we need to remember that Flett
has represented more of this district. Sparks has a good reputation
in Washington, and with his old constituents. But the same can
be said for Flett, and her constituents outnumber his by two-to-one.
Moreover, I love it when we get to run a Democrat in a district
with large numbers of African-American and union voters. This
will be a challenge, but we'll win.
Republican Party consultant Adam Newman offers this advice to
the Sparks campaign: I admire Al Sparks for running again even
after the abomination pulled against him by the Democrats in
the legislature. Obviously, the deck seems stacked in Flett's
favor here. Sparks has a pro-business record, which will really
hurt him with the unions. And, he is running against an African-African
woman, which won't help him with African-American voters. We
have two chances, both somewhat long shots. First, we must get
much higher turnout among his supporters than among hers. And,
we must be able to at least cut into her support among African-Americans
with abortion- and religion-based appeals. If we do both of these
things…maybe. If not, forget about it.
How to Teach this Case
This case provides an opportunity to teach about redistricting.
This sort of partisan redistricting is quite common in states
where one party controls the process, as the Democrats do here.
Teachers might use this case as an opportunity to address some
of the strategic aspects of districting. Note how the Democrats
carved one Republican district up to completely eliminate it.
Is this fair? This could get a nice discussion going.
Turnout will be important here. Poorer people, less educated
people, and younger people turn out to vote less than richer,
well-educated, older people do. And, significantly, African-American
turnout is lower than white turnout. Flett will thus need to
run two campaigns - in addition to getting people to decide to
vote for her, she will need to mobilize her supporters to come
out and vote on Election Day. This presents a different challenge
to her in commercials and speeches.
This campaign also features an African-American woman. It might
spark some nice discussions about some of the obstacles women
may race in running for higher office. And, African-American
voters have certainly faced many obstacles as well. While these
obstacles are presumably not central to the case, students may
be tempted on their own to create commercials for Flett that
use empowerment themes directed at women and minorities. The
Sparks team may have to come up with ways to counter this, being
sure to avoid any appeals to racist and/or sexist impulses.
See
also "How to Teach with Case Studies" |