
ID: 1968/SB31/3/41
Date: 1968
Larger Image: 89.13KB
|
Lesson
Plan Objectives
As students analyze the editorial cartoon, they will
- Understand the context in which the cartoon was drawn
- Discover
the basic elements of the cartoon
- Find and interpret the icons that
appear in the cartoon
- Identify the cartoonist’s message
- Develop skill in seeing
and understanding persuasive techniques used by cartoonists
- Identify
qualities of cartooning such as sensory, formal, expressive, technical,
and judgmental
|
“A cartoon does not tell everything about a subject. It's
not supposed to. No written piece tells everything either. As far
as words are concerned, there is no safety in numbers. The test
of a written or drawn commentary is whether it gets at an essential
truth.”
“The Cartoon by Herb Block” posted at http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/swann/herblock/cartoon.html |
|

ID: 1968 sb31 3 38
DATE: March 4, 1968
Larger Image: 98.36K

ID: 1968 sb31 3 40
DATE: March 6, 1968
Larger Image: 103.23K
|
Historical Context for the Cartoon
For the third time in three years, President Lyndon Johnson called for
a fair housing bill in 1968, saying it was “essential if we are
to relieve the crisis in our cities.” As was customary at the
time, opposing senators, mostly conservatives, filibustered the bill.
Three cloture votes to cut off debate were taken before a fourth one
succeeded.
Dirksen initially opposed the bill, fearing that it would open the door
to excessive federal regulation of private housing. But many among his
Republican ranks supported some version of fair housing legislation, and
the Minority Leader was forced to backtrack—he eventually voted for
the 1968 Fair Housing Act. Without his grudging support, the bill would
not have passed.
Factoring into his change of heart may have been the fact that Dirksen
faced a campaign for reelection in 1968.
“Cartooning is an irreverent
form of expression, and one particularly suited to scoffing at the
high and the mighty. If the prime role of a free press is to serve
as critic of government, cartooning is often the cutting edge of
that criticism.”
“The Cartoon by Herb Block” posted at http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/swann/
herblock/ cartoon.html
|
|
Analyzing the Cartoon
What follows are guidelines for analyzing or interpreting a cartoon.
Not all of them will apply to every cartoon, of course.
Visual Elements
- List the objects or people you see in the cartoon. Sometimes
cartoonists overdraw, or exaggerate, the physical characteristics of
people or things in order to make a point. When you study a cartoon,
look for any characteristics that seem overdone or overblown (facial
characteristics and clothing are some of the most commonly exaggerated
characteristics.) Then, try to decide what point the cartoonist was
trying to make through exaggeration.
- Which of the objects on your
list are symbols? Cartoonists use simple objects, or symbols, to stand
for larger concepts or ideas.
- What do you think each symbol means?
Words (not all cartoons have words)
- Identify the cartoon caption or title.
- Locate three words
or phrases used by the cartoonist to identify objects or people within
the cartoon. Cartoonists often label objects or people to make it
clear exactingly what they stand for. Watch out for the different
labels that appear in a cartoon, and ask yourself why the cartoonist
chose to label that particular person or object. Does the label make
the meaning of the object clearer?
- Record any important dates or numbers
that appear in the cartoon.
- Which words or phrases in the cartoon
appear to be the most significant?
- List adjectives that describe
the emotions portrayed in the cartoon.
Interpretation
- Describe the action taking place in the cartoon.
- Explain how the words in the cartoon clarify the symbols.
- Explain
the message of the cartoon.
- What is the cartoonist’s
opinion on this issue?
- Who would agree or disagree with the cartoon’s
message? Why?
- Did you find this cartoon informative? Why or why
not?
- Did you find this cartoon persuasive (not all editorial cartoons
are drawn to persuade, however)? Why or why not?
|